MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009529116 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2019-0343

Determination of Zn<sup>2+</sup> and Cd<sup>2+</sup> by glassy carbon electrode modified with <i>Perilla frutescens</i> activated carbon

2020· article· en· W3009529116 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lihui Zheng, Jinguo Chen, Lingli Wan, Xinyu Zheng, Zongzhi Ke

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCadmiumDifferential pulse voltammetryZincGlassy carbonAmperometryElectrochemistryActivated carbonSupporting electrolyteDetection limitElectrolyteCarbon fibersAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Buffer solutionNuclear chemistryCyclic voltammetryElectrodeInorganic chemistryChromatographyAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton activated carbon that had high specific surface area (HSAPFAC) was modified on the surface of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for preparing a HSAPFAC/GCE, and on this basis, a differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) method for the simultaneous determination of zinc and cadmium ions (Zn2+ and Cd2+) was developed by using HSAPFAC/GCE. The determination conditions such as the film thickness, deposition potential, deposition time, and electrolyte acidity were investigated. The amperometric determination was carried out in a NaAc–HAc buffer solution (0.1 mol L−1, pH 5.5) after enriching for 550 s at –1.3 V. The oxidation peaks appear at –1.160 V and –0.845 V for Zn2+ and Cd2+, respectively. The oxidation peak currents of Zn2+ and Cd2+ are proportional to their concentrations in the ranges of 0.5 ∼ 20 μg L−1 and 0.25 ∼ 10 μg L−1, with the detection limits of 0.15 μg L−1 and 0.01 μg L−1 (signal/noise (S/N) = 3). The proposed method was applied to the determination of Zn2+ and Cd2+ in tap water samples. The recoveries were 101.6%∼103.0% and 84.0%∼88.8%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207