Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to raise the question, "Is gravity the only way to bend the space-time, or can there be other ways to bend space-time?"The answer to this question can be either, A) a description of the mechanism of non-gravitational curvature of space-time, or B) proof that gravity is the only method to bend space-time and there is no other way.Since modern science can prove neither A nor B, the question raised in this article remains open.This article also discusses and rejects the objection that non-gravitational curvature of space-time would be observed as a kind of "additional" gravity, what is not taking place.The scale and strength of non-gravitational curvature is important.Also, the non-gravitational curvature of space-time does not necessarily have the U-shaped form, which we observe as a gravity.The explanation of gravity by the curvature of space-time generated by the presence of massenergy was put forward by Einstein in his works Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation [1] and Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie [2], published in 1915 and 1916 respectively.The Theory of General Relativity has been brilliantly confirmed in many fields of physics and is used in astronomy, engineering, astronautics, atomic physics, etc. Thus, General Relativity and subsequent experiments:A. created a precedent that space-time can be bent; B. proposed the presence of mass-energy as the mechanism of this curvature; C. confirmed this model in many experiments in various fields of science and technology.Thus, a precedent has been created.It is possible to bend space-time and there is at least one mechanism that can do this.However (as far as the author knows) no one has ever proved that gravity is the only way to bend space-time.Therefore, may there be some other mechanism of space-time curvature?This question is unusual, but in the absence of evidence that gravity is the only way to bend space-time, it is a legitimate one.The author's goal, of course, is not to propose another way to bend space time.Perhaps it simply does not exist.This article is merely a statement of the problem, which in all probability has only two solutions: A. a description of the mechanism of non-gravitational curvature of space-time, or B. proof that gravity is the only method to bend space-time and there is no other way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".