MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-Driven Emulation of Mobile Access Networks

2019· article· en· W3009717844 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Safari Khatouni, Martino Trevisan, Danilo Giordano

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationComputer scienceComputer networkMobile broadbandDistributed computingCellular networkTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network monitoring is fundamental to understand network evolution and behavior. However, monitoring studies have the main limitation of running new experiments when the phenomenon under analysis is over e.g., congestion. To overcome this limitation, network emulation is of vital importance for network testing and research experiments either in wired and mobile networks. When it comes to mobile networks, the variety of technical characteristics, coupled with the opaque network configurations, make realistic network emulation a challenging task. In this paper, we address this issue leveraging a large scale dataset composed of 500M network latency measurements in Mobile BroadBand networks. By using this dataset, we create 51 different network latency profiles based on the Mobile BroadBand operator, the radio access technology and signal strength. These profiles are then processed to make them compatible with the tc-netem emulation tool. Finally, we show that, despite the limitation of current tc-netem emulation tool, Generative Adversarial Networks are a promising solution used to create realistic temporal emulation. We believe that this work could be the first step toward a comprehensive data-driven network emulation. For this, we make our profiles and codes available to foster further studies in these directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207