MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009881536 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.02.026

Does Lymphocyte Count Impact Dosing of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation?

2020· article· en· W3009881536 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Francine Heelan, Ranjeeta Mallick, Adam Bryant, Osman Radhwi, Harold Atkins, Lothar Huebsch, Christopher Bredeson, David Allan, Natasha Kekre

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsThymoglobulinMedicineAnti-thymocyte globulinInternal medicineDosingTransplantationGastroenterologyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationIncidence (geometry)GlobulinUnivariate analysisCumulative incidenceImmunologyMultivariate analysisTacrolimus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anti­thymocyte globulin (ATG) is used to reduce the incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with hematopoietic cell transplantation, yet optimum dosing has yet to be determined. We have previously demonstrated that 2.5 mg/kg ATG in conditioning can reduce the incidence of GVHD in unrelated donor transplants. Recent literature has suggested that ATG dosing based on absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) could lead to more optimum exposure of the drug. We sought to determine if ALC at the time of transplant could impact clinical outcomes. We conducted a retrospective single-center study analyzing all consecutive patients at The Ottawa Hospital who received a matched unrelated donor stem cell transplant with ATG between 2009 and 2014. Patients received rabbit ATG (thymoglobulin) at 0.5 mg/kg on day –2 and 2.0 mg/kg on day –1. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine if any patient- or transplant-related factors, including weight, ALC, and total ATG dose given, impacted GVHD, relapse, or mortality. In total, 111 patients met inclusion, with a median age of 50 years (range, 19 to 70). The most common diagnoses were acute myelogenous leukemia (43%), Myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative neoplasms (13%), and lymphoma (12%). The median weight at time of conditioning was 80.3 kg (range, 45 to 216). The median ALC on the first day of ATG administration was 0.1 × 10 9 /L (range, 0 to 190). The median total dose of ATG received was 201 mg (range, 112 to 540 mg). The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 35.1% and 21.6%, respectively. In the multivariate model, the actual dose of ATG given to patients was not associated with GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.25; P = .07), relapse (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.30; P = .1), or mortality (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.28; P = .32). Similarly, the pretransplant ALC was not associated with GVHD (HR, 1; P = .82), relapse (HR, 1; P = .90), or mortality (HR, 1; P = .39). If patients had received ALC-based dosing according to previously published work (Admiraal et al., Lancet Haematol 2017), the mean total dose of ATG received would have been 1205 mg, more than 5 times the mean dose that was actually given based on weight. With GVHD outcomes being similar to that published by Admiraal et al. and ALC not independently associated with outcomes in our study, further studies are still needed to compare standard weight-based dosing to ALC-based dosing of ATG in matched unrelated donor stem cell transplant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207