MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PD4-02: Canadian cancer trials group trial IND.231: A phase 1 trial evaluating CX-5461, a novel first-in-class G-quadruplex stabilizer in patients with advanced solid tumors enriched for DNA-repair deficiencies

2020· article· en· W3009969158 on OpenAlexaffabout
John Hilton, Karen A. Gelmon, David W. Cescon, Anna V. Tinker, D. Jonker, Rachel Goodwin, Scott A. Laurie, Aaron R. Hansen, Samuel Aparício, John Soong, Linda Hagerman, Hongbo Lui, Philippe L. Bédard, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer AgencyOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineToxicityInternal medicineCancerClinical trialGastroenterologyOncologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: G-quadruplexes are secondary DNA structures that reversibly form in guanine-rich regions within DNA. Our group has demonstrated that CX-5461 selectively binds and stabilizes G-quadruplex structures, causing replication fork collapse and double-stranded DNA breaks. In BRCA1/2 deficient cell lines and xenograft models, synthetic lethality was observed. We are conducting a phase I study of CX-5461, a first-in-class G-quadruplex stabilizer, in patients with advanced solid tumors enriching for patients with DNA-repair deficiencies. Methods: We conducted a phase I study of 10 dose levels of CX-5461. The initial 7 dose levels (50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 325, 475 mg/m2) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 4-week cycle, while the final 3 dose levels (325, 475 and 650 mg/m2) were administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Escalation was performed using a 3+3 design. Eligible patients must have advanced disease, a PS 0-2 and adequate organ function. Patients were treated until disease progression. The primary objective was the determination of RP2D. The DLT evaluation period was cycle 1 and AEs needed to be maximally managed to be considered a DLT. Secondary objectives include ORR (RECIST 1.1), PK, and toxicity (CTCAEv4.0). Results: As of March 28th, 2019, 40 patients were registered on protocol with 39 patients evaluable for toxicity and 35 patients evaluable for response. 18 of the participants were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Of the evaluable patients, the median age is 53 with 24 patients having 3 or more prior regimens for their disease. There have been no DLTs observed to date. There were 5 treatment-related non-DLT grade 3 photosensitivity events (DL0, DL4, DL7, DL8, DL9) that were reversible and were secondary to lack of photo-protective measures. 3 SAEs were considered related to CX-5461 (photosensitivity of the skin (n=2); photosensitivity of the eyes (n=1). Treatment-related AEs ≥10% were photosensitivity of the skin (59%), photosensitivity of the eyes (21%), mucositis (15%), nausea (44%), hand-foot syndrome (23%), headache (10%) and rash (10%). The RP2D was determined to be 475 mg/m2 on days, 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. PK appears dose-proportional for Cmax and AUC24,∞. Of the 40 patients treated on protocol, 34 have discontinued from the study either due to objective progressive disease (n=29), symptomatic progression of disease (n=4) or withdrawal of consent (n=1). In terms of best response, 4 patients, including 3 with breast cancer, have a confirmed PR (2 germline BRCA2, 1 germline BRCA2 VUS, germline PALB2) with an additional 6 patients, including 2 with breast cancer, (4 germline BRCA2, 2 somatic BRCA1/2) with SD as best response for >=4 cycles. Conclusion: CX-5461 is tolerable with preventable photosensitivity being the main toxicity. The RP2D is now identified at 475 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Preliminary activity for CX-5461 has been observed in patients with HR-deficient tumors for both breast cancer and other tumor types. An expansion cohort, with mandatory tumor and skin biopsies, for patients with metastatic breast cancer with confirmed HR deficiency is currently open. Further updates will be provided. Citation Format: John Hilton, Karen Gelmon, David Cescon, Anna Tinker, Derek Jonker, Rachel Goodwin, Scott Laurie, Aaron Hansen, Samuel Aparicio, John Soong, Linda Hagerman, Hongbo Lui, Philippe Bedard, Kathleen Pritchard, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour. Canadian cancer trials group trial IND.231: A phase 1 trial evaluating CX-5461, a novel first-in-class G-quadruplex stabilizer in patients with advanced solid tumors enriched for DNA-repair deficiencies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-02.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207