MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W300999666

Book Review: Contested Histories in Public Space: Memory, Race, and Nation edited by Daniel J. Walkowitz and Lisa Maya Knauer

2009· article· en· W300999666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brooke Neely

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic historyPoliticsNarrativeContext (archaeology)IndigenousMedia studiesPublic spherePublic spaceRacial politicsMayaSociologyRace (biology)Gender studiesHistoryAnthropologyPolitical scienceLawArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review 52 Contested Histories in Public Space: Memory, Race, and Nation Edited by Daniel J. Walkowitz and Lisa Maya Knauer Duke University Press (2009) ISBN: 0822342367, 376 pages. Reviewed by: BROOKE NEELY How are racial and national narratives imagined in a postcolonial, global context? A growing body of work across the disciplines locates these processes in public sites of commemoration. Memorials, monuments, and other historical spaces operate as contested terrains for constructing, opposing, and negotiating racial and national discourses. In Daniel J. Walkowitz and Lisa Maya Knauer’s edited volume Contested Histories in Public Space: Memory, Race, and Nation, contributors illustrate these representational struggles at a variety of historical sites around the world, from New Zealand’s national museum to South Africa’s Voortrekker Monument, highlighting in particular how postcolonial theory has informed the character and politics of public debates over how to convey history. Walkowitz and Knauer argue that this is a particularly important time to study debates over history in the public sphere because deindustrialization and outsourcing have made cultural and historical sites important spaces for economic development. To address the range of ways public histories get contested, they divide the book into four main thematic sections that take the reader on a tour of four theoretical problems the editors see as central to the study of memory, race, and nation. The first section focuses on how indigenous groups engage with national historical sites in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada and attempt to expand and complicate the national narratives that circulate in these memorial spaces. For example, Ruth B. Phillips and Mark Salber Phillips offer a compelling piece on the First Peoples’ Hall at the Canadian Museum of Civilization. They detail the conflicts and collaborations that emerged in the process of expanding the museum’s narratives in ways that legitimate indigenous epistemologies and foreground First Peoples’ traditional and contemporary experiences. In this case, we see how museum spaces can avoid singular narratives and artifact-oriented displays by offering unfinished, multiple, and fragmented stories of current and former Native inhabitants as well as by conveying the ongoing political struggles surrounding identity, land rights, and sovereignty. Similarly, Paul Ashton and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207