MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mariano Pavanello. — La papaye empoisonnée. Essais sur la société Akan des Nzema

2020· article· fr· W3010014539 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Hecquet

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d études africaines · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Nzema sont une socit du groupe ethnolinguistique akan vivant l'extrme pointe sud-occidentale du Ghana et, dans une part bien moindre, l'est de la Cte d'Ivoire. Les derniers recensements avancent le chiffre trs sous-valu de 200 000 personnes. Le nombre de locuteurs de la langue nzema serait de 366 000 en 2013 selon le site Internet Ethnologue. Les Nzema habitent depuis la cte de l'ocan jusqu'aux reliquats de forts vierges de l'arrire-pays. Ils y seraient arrivs au XV e sicle, attirs par les ressources de la fort, la possibilit de produire de l'or et du sel et aussi de commercer avec les Europens. Les rcits mythiques font concider l'arrive des anctres et la prsence de leur premier roi Amihyia Kpanyinli avec l'arrive des Portugais dans le Golfe de Guine. En ralit, ce roi vcut au XVII e sicle et permit aux Britanniques de construire le fort Apollonie sur la plage de Beyin partir de 1765. Les Nzema furent des intermdiaires essentiels du commerce avec les Europens auxquels ils vendaient des esclaves et de l'ivoire, tandis qu'ils revendaient aux groupes de l'arrire-pays armes feu et poissons schs. partir des annes 1920, l'conomie et le territoire furent mtamorphoss par le dveloppement de plantations de cocotiers et de palmiers huile. Cette tradition sylvicole imprgne fortement la vie sociale et la culture des Nzema, de mme que l'hritage commercial et la mmoire refoule de l'esclavage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d études africainesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207