MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Multicenter phase II study of combined neoadjuvant docetaxel and androgen ablation (ADT) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients (pts) with high risk localized prostate cancer (LCaP): Pathologic outcomes and 3-year follow-up analyses

2007· article· en· W3010040987 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Winquist, K. N., Joseph L. Chin, Larry Goldenberg, Laurence Klotz, Scott Berry, Fred Saad, Paul Perrotte, Dean Ruether, John Trachtenberg, Martin Gleave

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHealth Sciences CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDocetaxelProstate cancerUrologyProstatectomyInternal medicineGoserelinClinical endpointCancerGynecologySurgeryClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5002 Background: Pts with high risk LCaP (cT3, Gleason score > 7 &/or PSA > 20) have an increased risk of relapse with a biochemical failure rate of >50% at 3 years after RP. Docetaxel is active in hormone refractory prostate cancer & potentially beneficial if combined with ADT for treatment naïve disease. The objectives of this trial were to assess the pathologic outcomes & feasibility of docetaxel + ADT in men with LCaP prior to RP. Methods: A phase II multi-center study of newly diagnosed previously untreated pts with clinically LCaP with high-risk features. All pts received ADT (buserelin acetate 6.3 mg q8 weeks x 3 and anti-androgen for 4 weeks) plus docetaxel (35 mg/m2 weekly for 6 out of 8 weeks for 3 cycles) prior to RP. Results: 72 men with a median age of 59 years (range 46–78) were enrolled at 6 sites. Baseline characteristics included: clinical stage T1C, T2 & T3 in 14%, 47% & 39%; and Gleason score <7, 7 & >7 in 10%, 30% & 60% of pts; respectively. Median baseline PSA was 10.8 μg/L (range 1.6–65.6) with PSA < 10 in 47%, 10–20 in 24% & >20 in 29% of pts. Eight pts did not complete protocol therapy because of toxicity (n=4), withdrawal of consent (n=1), or other reasons (n=3). 1 pt had myocardial infarction day 1 post-operatively & 1 pt had DVT 1.5 months after RP. No other major post-operative complications were reported. Of the 64 pts completing protocol therapy, 2 had a complete pathologic response and pathologic stage was T2 in 34 (53%) and T3 in 28 (44%) pts. Four pts had N1 disease & positive surgical margins were identified in 17 (27%). On multivariate Cox regression analysis only baseline Gleason score (=7 vs. >7) was associated with PSA recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 4.58, 95% CI 1.32–15.93). At a median follow-up of 42.7 months (range 25.6–65.6), 19 (30%) pts have relapsed. Three pts have died at 32.0, 40.0 & 40.3 months, with all deaths attributed to prostate cancer. Conclusions: Combined ADT and docetaxel prior to RP was feasible and resulted in encouraging pathologic outcomes and PSA- recurrence free survival. These data further support the rationale for randomized trials determining the efficacy of chemo-hormonal therapy in pts with clinically LCaP. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→