MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3010128109 · doi:10.1161/circ.141.suppl_1.mp61

Abstract MP61: Evidence of Impaired Microvascular Function a Decade After Delivery in Women With Placental Malperfusion Lesions

2020· article· en· W3010128109 on OpenAlexaff
Alisse Hauspurg, Judith Brands, Robin E. Gandley, Matthew F. Muldoon, William Tony Parks, Carl A. Hubel, Janet M. Catov

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlycocalyxPlacentaMicrocirculationPreeclampsiaIntervillous spacePregnancyPathologyPathophysiologyInternal medicineFetusImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) lesions in the placenta are characterized by incomplete vascular remodeling and vessel features similar to atherosclerosis. MVM lesions indicate a maladaptive maternal vascular response to pregnancy, are often detected in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and may provide a pathologic link to future cardiovascular disease. The endothelial glycocalyx is a glycoprotein-rich layer that is critical for microvascular health and damage may have an important role in the pathophysiology of microcardiovascular disease risk. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that women with malperfusion lesions of the placenta are more likely to evidence microvascular glycocalyx derangement a decade after delivery compared to women without these lesions and that this effect would be most pronounced among women with a history of HDP. Methods: A total of 412 women with placental pathology (N=129 with MVM lesions, N=283 without MVM lesions) were evaluated at 8-10 years postpartum. Placental specimens were reviewed by a blinded perinatal pathologist . HDP (including preeclampsia and gestational hypertension) were abstracted from the medical record. Glycocalyx barrier function was assessed using sublingual sidestream dark field imaging, with reduction defined as deeper penetration of red blood cells (RBCs) into the glycocalyx of the sublingual microcirculation (5-25μm diameter). We compared the median diameter (size) of microvessels, penetration of RBCs into the glycocalyx (perfused boundary region, PBR) and microvascular density (total length of perfused microvessels/mm 2 surface area) in women with and without MVM lesions. Results: Women with placental MVM lesions had smaller-sized sublingual vessels (median 8.59 μM [IQR 8.12, 9.19] vs. 9.01 μM [IQR 8.37, 9.64]; p<0.001), and a lower density of vessels compared to women without lesions. Glycocalyx perfused boundary region was unexpectedly lower in women with MVM lesions (median 2.20 μM [IQR 2.06, 2.43] vs. 2.32 μM [IQR 2.15, 2.50]; p=0.003) in 10-19 μM vessels. Women with HDP and MVM lesions appear to be the most impacted, with the smallest size vessels (median 8.47 [IQR 8.09-9.13]) and the lowest glycocalyx PBR across all vessel sizes. Women with MVM lesions without a HDP similarly had evidence of microvascular glycocalyx derangement whereas women with HDP without placental lesions had a glycocalyx profile similar to women without MVM or a history of HDP. Conclusions: A decade after delivery, women with a history of placental malperfusion lesions had alterations in microvascular perfusion. Women with MVM lesions and a history of HDP appear to be the most severely impacted, which may reflect an underlying maladaptive vascular phenotype detected in the placenta at the time of pregnancy that might provide pathologic insight into future maternal microvascular health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→