P93 Relationship Between Central Pressure and Urinary Sodium Excretion in a Population-based Study in Salvador, Brazil, Preliminary Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Central pressure (CP) has shown to be more reliable than cardiovascular mortality; salt intake in the diet is directly related to the increase in CP. Methods A population-based cross-sectional study representative of a neighborhood of Salvador-BA, Brazil, distributed in 12 census tracts according to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. The overall sample is randomized in adults from the assigned area, from December 2016 to May 2019 comprise 145 people. The central pressure, measured in the radial artery, obtained through aplanation tonometry, using the SphygmoCor ® apparatus (XCEL, AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia, [2] with confidence ≥85%). PC is evaluated directly by the central systolic pressure and diastolic pressure. Collected blood and urine sodium 24 hours were quantified by the ADVIA 1800 ® selective ion electrode (SiemensHealthcare Japan/Canada), and all participants signed a Free and Informed Consent Form. Mean, standard deviation, Spearman’s linear correlation coefficient between CP and Na + , stratified by age and sex, using STATA v.12 software for treatment and generation of results, and the level of significance statistic of 5%. Results For both sexes, were inversely proportional, although not significant. Conclusion The results obtained aren’t adequate as evidence in the literature. A larger sample is needed for accuracy in this group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".