MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3010363871 · doi:10.1101/2020.02.29.971374

Applying a gene-suite approach to examine the physiological status of wild-caught walleye ( <i>Sander vitreus</i> )

2020· preprint· en· W3010363871 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jennifer D. Jeffrey, Hunter Carlson, Dale A. Wrubleski, Eva C. Enders, Jason R. Treberg, Ken M. Jeffries

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaDucks Unlimited CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBiologyMarshEcologyCyprinusShrimpFisheryCommon carpZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>Wetland

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Molecular techniques have been increasingly used in a conservation physiology framework to provide valuable information regarding the mechanisms underlying responses of wild organisms to environmental and anthropogenic stressors. In the present study, we developed a reference gill transcriptome for walleye ( Sander vitreus ) allowing us to pair a gene-suite approach with multivariate statistics to examine the physiological status of wild-caught walleye. For molecular analyses of wild fish, the gill is a useful target for conservation studies, not only because of its importance as an indicator of the physiological status of fish but also because it can be biopsied non-lethally. Walleye were non-lethally sampled following short- (∼1.5 month) and long-term (∼3.5 month) holding in the Delta Marsh, that is located south of Lake Manitoba in Manitoba, Canada. Large-bodied walleye are held in the Delta Marsh from late April to early August by exclusion screens used to protect the marsh from invasive common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ), exposing fish to potentially stressful water quality conditions. Principal components analysis (PCA) revealed patterns of transcript abundance consistent with exposure of fish to increasingly high temperature and low oxygen conditions with longer holding in the marsh. For example, longer-term holding in the marsh was associated with increases in the mRNA levels of heat shock proteins and a shift in the mRNA abundance of aerobic to anaerobic metabolic genes. Overall, the results of the present study suggest that walleye held in the Delta Marsh may be exhibiting sub-lethal responses to high temperature and low oxygen conditions and provides valuable information for managers invested in mediating these impacts to a local species of conservation concern. More broadly, we highlight the usefulness of pairing transcriptomic techniques with multivariate statistics to address potential confounding factors that can affect measured physiological responses of wild-caught fish. Lay summary Non-lethal molecular techniques were used to assess the physiological status of wild-caught walleye confined in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba, Canada, because of common carp exclusion screens. Walleye sampled during the warmest months of the year exhibited responses to elevated temperature and low oxygen conditions, suggesting sub-lethal effects of local conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→