MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010391404 · doi:10.1099/acmi.fis2019.po0136

National Audit of Meningitis Management (NAMM): a National Infection Trainee Collaborative for Audit and Research (NITCAR) audit of adherence to the 2016 UK joint specialist societies’ guideline on the diagnosis and management of acute meningitis in adults

2020· article· en· W3010391404 on OpenAlexaff
Fiona McGill, Jayne Ellis, David Harvey, Sylviane Defres, Eloisa MacLachlan, Tom Solomon, Arjun Chandna, Robert Heydermanon

Bibliographic record

VenueAccess Microbiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineMeningitisLumbar punctureCeftriaxoneAuditNeisseria meningitidisIntensive care medicinePediatricsEtiologyAntibioticsInternal medicineEmergency medicineCerebrospinal fluidPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Bacterial meningitis has significant mortality but frontline doctors will see it infrequently. Therefore, UK guidance on meningitis in adults, with auditable standards, was revised in 2016. We undertook a national audit to assess adherence to the guidelines. Methods Patients with community acquired meningitis were identified through coding or laboratory data. Audit standards, including immediate management, diagnostics and treatment, were evaluated by notes review. Results Notes from 1472 patients with meningitis were reviewed – 309/1472 (21%) had bacterial aetiology, 615/1472 (42%) viral, 548/1472 (37%) unidentified aetiology. Only 50% of patients had blood cultures taken within one hour of admission and just 2% had a lumbar puncture (LP) within the first hour. 27% received antibiotics within one hour. Most patients received ceftriaxone or cefotaxime but only 37% of over-60s received empirical anti-listeria antibiotics. 26% of patients who had antibiotics were given adjunctive steroids. Half had CSF microscopy within two hours of LP. Less than a third had pneumococcal and/or meningococcal PCR on cerebrospinal fluid. Only 44% had an HIV test. 62% had unnecessary neuroimaging before LP. Overall mortality was 3% - 16% in pneumococcal disease and 8% in meningococcal meningitis. There was a trend toward improved survival in patients with pneumococcal meningitis who received dexamethasone [85/96 (88%)] compared to those who did not [57/73 (78%)] (p=0.066). Conclusions Adherence to the meningitis guidelines is inadequate, potentially compromising patient safety. Improvements in guideline dissemination, novel educational resources and clinician and patient engagement are required if we are to increase guideline adherence and improve outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.082
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.148
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0820.148
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccess MicrobiologySame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207