National Audit of Meningitis Management (NAMM): a National Infection Trainee Collaborative for Audit and Research (NITCAR) audit of adherence to the 2016 UK joint specialist societies’ guideline on the diagnosis and management of acute meningitis in adults
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Bacterial meningitis has significant mortality but frontline doctors will see it infrequently. Therefore, UK guidance on meningitis in adults, with auditable standards, was revised in 2016. We undertook a national audit to assess adherence to the guidelines. Methods Patients with community acquired meningitis were identified through coding or laboratory data. Audit standards, including immediate management, diagnostics and treatment, were evaluated by notes review. Results Notes from 1472 patients with meningitis were reviewed – 309/1472 (21%) had bacterial aetiology, 615/1472 (42%) viral, 548/1472 (37%) unidentified aetiology. Only 50% of patients had blood cultures taken within one hour of admission and just 2% had a lumbar puncture (LP) within the first hour. 27% received antibiotics within one hour. Most patients received ceftriaxone or cefotaxime but only 37% of over-60s received empirical anti-listeria antibiotics. 26% of patients who had antibiotics were given adjunctive steroids. Half had CSF microscopy within two hours of LP. Less than a third had pneumococcal and/or meningococcal PCR on cerebrospinal fluid. Only 44% had an HIV test. 62% had unnecessary neuroimaging before LP. Overall mortality was 3% - 16% in pneumococcal disease and 8% in meningococcal meningitis. There was a trend toward improved survival in patients with pneumococcal meningitis who received dexamethasone [85/96 (88%)] compared to those who did not [57/73 (78%)] (p=0.066). Conclusions Adherence to the meningitis guidelines is inadequate, potentially compromising patient safety. Improvements in guideline dissemination, novel educational resources and clinician and patient engagement are required if we are to increase guideline adherence and improve outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it