Enzymatic cross‐linking to improve the handling properties of dough prepared within a normal and reduced NaCl environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research examines the use of three enzymes [glucose oxidase (GOX), hexose oxidase (HOX), and xylanase (XYL)] and their combinations [GOX-XYL and HOX-XYL] on the dough handling properties of CDC Plentiful and Stettler wheat cultivars prepared at reduced (1.0% wt. by flour) and normal (2.0% wt. by flour) NaCl levels. Properties investigated include dough rheology, stickiness, and ratio of resistance to extension and extensibility. The inclusion of XYL and its combinations with GOX and HOX increased the stickiness, yielded lower dough strength indicated by rheology, and reduced the ratio of resistance to extension and extensibility. The inclusion of oxidative enzymes yielded a stronger dough, where HOX addition to dough had the lowest stickiness values and highest |G*| values, whereas GOX addition led to the highest ratio of resistance to extension-extensibility. NaCl only had minor effects overall on dough strength and stickiness for the cultivars studied. Overall, superior dough handling properties were observed with oxidative enzyme addition (GOX and HOX) suggesting that the increased crosslinking that occurs could aid in improving low sodium bread dough properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it