Canine Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Diffuse Remodeling, Focal Lesions, and the Involvement of Macrophages and New Vessel Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is among the most common cardiac diseases in dogs. Its pathogenesis is not fully understood, but myocardial remodeling and inflammation are suspected to be involved. The present study aimed to characterize the pathological processes in canine DCM, investigating morphological changes in association with the expression of relevant cytokines and remodeling markers. The myocardium of 17 dogs with DCM and 6 dogs without cardiac diseases was histologically evaluated, and selected cases were further examined by immunohistochemistry, morphometry, and reverse transcription quantitative PCR. In DCM, the myocardium exhibited subtle but statistically significant diffuse quantitative changes. These comprised increased interstitial collagen deposition and macrophage numbers, as well as an overall reduced proportion of contractile tissue. This was accompanied by a significant increase in myocardial transcription of intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) 1, inflammatory cytokines, and remodeling enzymes. Laser microdissection showed that cardiomyocytes transcribed most relevant markers including ICAM-1, tumor necrosis factor α, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP) 1 and TIMP-2. In addition, there were multifocal cell-rich lesions characterized by fibrosis, neovascularization, macrophage infiltration, and cardiomyocyte degeneration. In these, macrophages were often found to express ICAM-1, TGF-β, and vascular endothelial growth factor; the former two were also expressed by cardiomyocytes. These results characterize the diffuse myocardial remodeling processes that occur in DCM. The observed multifocal cell-rich lesions might result from reduced tissue perfusion. Macrophages and cardiomyocytes seem to actively contribute to the remodeling processes, which ultimately lead to cardiac dilation and dysfunction. The precise role of the involved cells and the factors initiating the remodeling process still needs to be identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".