Decision of Purchase Based on Life Style and Brand Image through Interest in Buying Personal Care Products in PT Easton Klaeris Indonesia Branch of Padang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to explain the effect of life style and brand image on purchasing decisions for personal care products. The analytical method uses descriptive and quantitative approaches in which data collection uses questionnaires. This questionnaire was delivered to respondents by interview. The sample size is 100 respondents. The results showed that life style simultaneously had no effect on purchasing decisions, brand image simultaneously had a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions, buying interest influenced life style in a persial manner and had a significant effect. Brand image influenced buying interest in a persial manner and had a significant effect. Purchasing interest has a positive and significant influence on purchasing decisions, the influence of intervening buying interest on life style variables shows no significant effect and buying interest on brand image variables shows a higher influence. Thus it is recommended that marketers use brand image to build purchasing decisions and buying interest as a support for building customer mind shares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it