Preparation of mesoporous MCM‐41 supported zinc sorbents by microwave in‐situ oxidation for H<sub>2</sub>S removal in coal gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Zn‐based MCM‐41 supporter sorbents were prepared using the microwave in‐situ oxidation method. Other sorbents were heated using a conventional heating method to contrast the performance for H2S removal. The sorbents were tested at 500°C in fixed reactor and dried simulated Texaco coal gas was employed for the sulphurized atmosphere. The results show that sorbents prepared by microwave oxidation had a better toleration for the adsorption of H2S. A 13.2% improvement occurred in the sulphur capacity of the sorbents heated by the microwave method. XRD, SEM with EDS‐element mapping, TEM, N2 adsorption, and XPS were used to characterize the properties of the sorbents. Due to the selective heating of the microwave and the superiority of the in‐situ oxidation method, the sorbents heated by microwave exhibited more appropriate structures for sulphurization. Meanwhile, the even heating environment supplied by the microwave resulted in a more uniform distribution of the active component. The microwave also had an effect on the chemical bond and reduced the binding energy of the active component, which enhanced the reactivity between the H2S and the sorbents. The preferable features generated by microwave in‐situ oxidation accelerate the replacement of S to O, and therefore the Zn‐based MCM‐41 sorbents prepared by the microwave method have an increased capability for H2S removal in high temperature coal gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".