MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010735980 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2982193

HDA Video Transmission Scheme for DASH

2020· article· en· W3010735980 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Wen, Anhong Wang, Jie Liang, Lijun Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersShanxi UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPComputer scienceDashRetransmissionMultimediaComputer networkQuality of experienceVideo qualityBandwidth (computing)Transmission (telecommunications)Channel (broadcasting)Quality of serviceThe InternetReal-time computingNetwork packetTelecommunicationsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, with the development of Internet communication technology, more and more people tend to get information through the network. And people prefer multimedia video streaming services. Traditional streaming media technology cannot meet people's needs because of its limitations. Recently, HTTP-based Dynamic Adaptive Streaming Over HTTP (DASH) has emerged as a new approach. In this paper, we consider two hybrid digital and analog video transmission schemes for DASH and propose three methods of enhancing the video quality of experience (QoE) of DASH users. First of all, considering the importance of data to video quality, we propose an energy-aware recombination method of reorganizing and packaging data and define the priority of the generated DASH layer in transmission. Second, we design an adaptive bitrate allocation algorithm to improve bandwidth utilization and video quality. Finally, we propose a retransmission mechanism to address the situation in which the digital stream at the receiving end cannot be decoded due to channel distance errors. Experiments show that our two schemes are superior to traditional DASH schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207