Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fungal diversity notes is one of the important journal series of fungal taxonomy that provide detailed descriptions and illustrations of new fungal taxa, as well as providing new information of fungal taxa worldwide. This article is the 11th contribution to the fungal diversity notes series, in which 126 taxa distributed in two phyla, six classes, 24 orders and 55 families are described and illustrated. Taxa in this study were mainly collected from Italy by Erio Camporesi and also collected from China, India and Thailand, as well as in some other European, North American and South American countries. Taxa described in the present study include two new families, 12 new genera, 82 new species, five new combinations and 25 new records on new hosts and new geographical distributions as well as sexual-asexual reports. The two new families are Eriomycetaceae (Dothideomycetes, family incertae sedis ) and Fasciatisporaceae ( Xylariales , Sordariomycetes). The twelve new genera comprise Bhagirathimyces ( Phaeosphaeriaceae ), Camporesiomyces ( Tubeufiaceae ), Eriocamporesia ( Cryphonectriaceae ), Eriomyces ( Eriomycetaceae ), Neomonodictys ( Pleurotheciaceae ), Paraloratospora ( Phaeosphaeriaceae ), Paramonodictys ( Parabambusicolaceae ), Pseudoconlarium (Diaporthomycetidae, genus incertae sedis ), Pseudomurilentithecium ( Lentitheciaceae ), Setoapiospora ( Muyocopronaceae ), Srinivasanomyces ( Vibrisseaceae ) and Xenoanthostomella ( Xylariales , genera incertae sedis ). The 82 new species comprise Acremonium chiangraiense , Adustochaete nivea , Angustimassarina camporesii , Bhagirathimyces himalayensis , Brunneoclavispora camporesii , Camarosporidiella camporesii , Camporesiomyces mali , Camposporium appendiculatum , Camposporium multiseptatum , Camposporium septatum , Canalisporium aquaticium , Clonostachys eriocamporesiana , Clonostachys eriocamporesii , Colletotrichum hederiicola , Coniochaeta vineae , Conioscypha verrucosa , Cortinarius ainsworthii , Cortinarius aurae , Cortinarius britannicus , Cortinarius heatherae , Cortinarius scoticus , Cortinarius subsaniosus , Cytospora fusispora , Cytospora rosigena , Diaporthe camporesii , Diaporthe nigra , Diatrypella yunnanensis , Dictyosporium muriformis , Didymella camporesii , Diutina bernali , Diutina sipiczkii , Eriocamporesia aurantia , Eriomyces heveae , Ernakulamia tanakae , Falciformispora uttaraditensis , Fasciatispora cocoes , Foliophoma camporesii , Fuscostagonospora camporesii , Helvella subtinta , Kalmusia erioi , Keissleriella camporesiana , Keissleriella camporesii , Lanspora cylindrospora , Loratospora arezzoensis , Mariannaea atlantica , Melanographium phoenicis , Montagnula camporesii , Neodidymelliopsis camporesii , Neokalmusia kunmingensis , Neoleptosporella camporesiana , Neomonodictys muriformis , Neomyrmecridium guizhouense , Neosetophoma camporesii , Paraloratospora camporesii , Paramonodictys solitarius , Periconia palmicola , Plenodomus triseptatus , Pseudocamarosporium camporesii , Pseudocercospora maetaengensis , Pseudochaetosphaeronema kunmingense , Pseudoconlarium punctiforme , Pseudodactylaria camporesiana , Pseudomurilentithecium camporesii , Pseudotetraploa rajmachiensis , Pseudotruncatella camporesii , Rhexocercosporidium senecionis , Rhytidhysteron camporesii , Rhytidhysteron erioi , Septoriella camporesii ,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".