A Role for Gravity Currents in Cross‐Sill Estuarine Exchange and Subsurface Inflow to the Southern Strait of Georgia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multiyear current meter records from five sites are used to examine subsurface renewal processes in the southern Strait of Georgia. The lower layer inflow of dense oceanic‐derived water over the ~100‐m deep sill in Boundary Pass near the entrance to the strait reaches peak velocities during spring tides and rarely reverses direction. Corresponding changes in water density over the sill are inversely correlated with inflow velocity and, it is assumed, with temporal (t) variations in bottom layer thickness, h(t), arising from the fortnightly variations in tidal‐mixing. The dense bottom water crossing the sill transforms into a gravity current whose velocity is dependent on both h and sill depth, H. Gravity flow velocities, which peak at h(t)/H ~ 0.3 and weaken for h → 0 (neap tides) and h → H (spring tides), modulate the cross‐sill exchange with the strait. The density anomaly, Δρ, of the gravity flow determines its terminal depth and along‐strait extent. Lower‐density gravity flows generated during spring tides separate from the sloping bottom of the southern strait, but the higher‐density flows formed during neap tides can penetrate over 100 km northward to the deep central basin. The most extensive bottom intrusions occur monthly near neap tides in summer, when the underlying estuarine circulation delivers dense upwelled water from the coast to the sill. These deep inflows are accompanied by strong middepth outflow. There are typically three to five monthly replacement episodes each summer, but fewer during strong El Niño years due to reduced coastal upwelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".