Feasibility and Effectiveness of Implementing a Novel Exercise and Self-Management Programme during Chemotherapy for Women with Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a novel exercise and self-management programme for women with breast cancer during chemotherapy. Method: The study used a pilot implementation design with a randomized controlled trial methodology. The 26 participants were adult breast cancer survivors (Stages 1–3) undergoing chemotherapy treatment. The intervention group received eight sessions of individualized, supervised, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, paired with self-management modules in the cancer institution; the comparison group received usual care. The primary outcome assessed was feasibility of the implementation strategies. The secondary outcomes – level of physical activity, quality of life, exercise knowledge and behaviour, and perception of health status – were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 2- and 4-month follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to measure the feasibility outcomes (recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence rate, and number of adverse events). A repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used to compare the secondary outcomes between the intervention and control groups at various time points. Results: The recruitment rate was 96%, retention rate was 100%, and adherence rate was 89%. No adverse events occurred. A between-groups difference was found for levels of physical activity post-intervention (mean difference = 25.38 points on the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire; 95% CI: 9.34, 41.42). There were no other significant findings. Conclusions: The implementation strategy was feasible. This programme has the potential to improve women’s physical activity level during chemotherapy. Further research is needed to determine strategies to help survivors maintain these results over the long term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".