Nanoporosity Stimulates Cell Spreading and Focal Adhesion Formation in Cells with Mutated Paxillin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have evaluated the response to nanotopography of CHO-K1 cells that express wild-type paxillin or paxillin with mutations at serine 273 that inhibit phosphorylation. Cells were grown on nanoporous and polished titanium surfaces. With all cell types, immunofluorescence showed that adhesion and spreading were minimally affected on the treated surface and that the actin filaments were more abundant and well-aligned. Scanning electron microscopy revealed changes in cell shape and abundant filopodia with lateral nanoprotrusions in response to nanoporosity. Gene expression of proteins associated with cellular adhesion and protrusions was significantly increased on the nanoporous surface regardless of the cell type. In particular, α-actinin, Rac1, Cdc42, and ITGα1 were upregulated in S273 cells with alanine substitutions, whereas FAK, Pxn, and Src were downregulated, leading to improved focal adhesion formation. These findings suggest that the surface nanoporosity can "compensate for" the genetic mutations that affect the biomechanical relationship of cells to surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".