MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011117412 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909919

2D/3D Heterostructure for Semitransparent Perovskite Solar Cells with Engineered Bandgap Enables Efficiencies Exceeding 25% in Four‐Terminal Tandems with Silicon and CIGS

2020· article· en· W3011117412 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Saba Gharibzadeh, Ihteaz M. Hossain, Paul Faßl, Bahram Abdollahi Nejand, Tobias Abzieher, Moritz Schultes, Erik Ahlswede, Philip Jackson, Michael Powalla, Sören Schäfer, Michael Rienäcker, Tobias Wietler, Robby Peibst, Uli Lemmer, Bryce S. Richards, Ulrich W. Paetzold

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Gender and HealthBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und EnergieHelmholtz AssociationMax Planck School of PhotonicsHelmholtz Energy Materials FoundryBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsMaterials scienceTandemPerovskite (structure)Band gapCopper indium gallium selenide solar cellsOptoelectronicsPhotovoltaicsPassivationEnergy conversion efficiencyHeterojunctionPhotovoltaic systemNanotechnologySolar cellElectrical engineeringCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wide‐bandgap perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with optimal bandgap ( E g ) and high power conversion efficiency (PCE) are key to high‐performance perovskite‐based tandem photovoltaics. A 2D/3D perovskite heterostructure passivation is employed for double‐cation wide‐bandgap PSCs with engineered bandgap (1.65 eV ≤ E g ≤ 1.85 eV), which results in improved stabilized PCEs and a strong enhancement in open‐circuit voltages of around 45 mV compared to reference devices for all investigated bandgaps. Making use of this strategy, semitransparent PSCs with engineered bandgap are developed, which show stabilized PCEs of up to 25.7% and 25.0% in four‐terminal perovskite/c‐Si and perovskite/CIGS tandem solar cells, respectively. Moreover, comparable tandem PCEs are observed for a broad range of perovskite bandgaps. For the first time, the robustness of the four‐terminal tandem configuration with respect to variations in the perovskite bandgap for two state‐of‐the‐art bottom solar cells is experimentally validated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations168
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207