MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011143155

Organization And Introgression Mechanics Of Phaseolus Vulgaris (Common Bean)

2020· article· en· W3011143155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seth Munholland

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaseolusIntrogressionBiologyAgronomyBotanyGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phaseolus vulgaris is a major food crop grown and consumed around the world. A new world vegetable, the common bean underwent two separate domestication events, both pre-Columbus. These events generated two different land races, the Mesoamerican and Andean, named for the area where the domestication took place. Since the initial domestications the land races have been generally evenly cultivated, but despite its popularity the common bean has only very recently been fully sequenced. One of the issues faced by bean growers worldwide is Common Bacterial Blight (CBB). A disease caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis, CBB causes crop loses ranging from 20–40% every year but does not affect all species within Phaseolus evenly; P. acutifolius, for example, shows an innate resistance to CBB. To leverage this advantage, researchers at the University of Guelph, in partnership with the Ontario Agricultural College, developed a cultivar of Mesoamerican P. vulgaris that was introgressed with PI440795, a P. acutifolius accession, and backcrossed repeatedly with several other Mesoamerican P. vulgaris accessions to generate ‘OAC-Rex’, a plant that displays the crop-desired traits of P. vulgaris and the disease resistance traits of P. acutifolius. Genetic introgression is the process of crossing distantly related organisms followed by repeated backcrossing, resulting in a viable offspring that displays characteristics of each parent. Though rarely occurring, it can be observed in both plants and animals and is often exploited in a crop development context to generate new cultivars. Unfortunately, though regularly observed, introgression has been followed on a predominantly phenotypic level, usually many generations after the event, and as such molecular aspects of this phenomenon are largely unknown.By studying OAC-Rex, PI440795, and G-19833 (an Andean cultivar whose whole-genome has been published) introgression was examined directly and a method for the detection of regions within the introgressed genome uniquely donated from either parent

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207