MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011144404 · doi:10.1007/s10494-020-00120-6

Assessment of an Evolution Equation for the Displacement Speed of a Constant-Density Reactive Scalar Field

2020· article· en· W3011144404 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rixin Yu, Thommie Nilsson, Geert Brethouwer, Nilanjan Chakraborty, Andrei N. Lipatnikov

Bibliographic record

VenueFlow Turbulence and Combustion · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVetenskapsrådetLunds UniversitetEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsScalar fieldTurbulenceScalar (mathematics)MechanicsClassical mechanicsIsotropyConvection–diffusion equationDisplacement (psychology)PhysicsWork (physics)CurvatureDirect numerical simulationDisplacement fieldStatistical physicsMathematicsGeometryThermodynamicsFinite element methodOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The displacement speed that characterises the self-propagation of isosurfaces of a reaction progress variable is of key importance for turbulent premixed reacting flow. The evolution equation for the displacement speed was derived in a recent work of Yu and Lipatnikov (Phys Rev E 100:013107, 2019a) for the case where the flame is described by a transport equation for single reaction progress variable assuming simple transport and one-step chemistry. This equation represents interaction of a number of complex coupled mechanisms related to straining by the velocity field, surface curvature and the scalar gradient. The aim of the current work is to provide detailed physical explanations of the displacement speed equation and its various terms, and to provide a new perspective to understand the mechanisms responsible for observed variations in the displacement speed. The equation is then used to analyze the propagation of a statistically planar reaction wave in homogeneous isotropic constant-density turbulence using direct numerical simulations. Additional emphasis is put on retracting surface segments that have a negative displacement speed, a phenomenon that commonly occurs at high Karlovitz numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlow Turbulence and CombustionSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207