Ceļš / The way, Nr. 70 (2019)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
raksta nolks ir pardt, ka literatr atsauce uz platonismu, hellnismu un Platona dialogiem "Faidrs" un "Dzres" zinm kontekst, raugoties no darba autora / varoa skatpunkta, ir alzija uz darb / varoa tl ietverto homoseksulo aspektu. Protams, "Faidr" un "Dzrs" ir ar citi sli, kas darbojas citos kontekstos, tau eit to -kop 19. gadsimta nostiprinjusies -loma ir nordt uz piederbu zinmai tradcijai, kur dialogi kalpo k "grieu mlas" strakmens, k autora "domts" informcijas nesjs, kas sniedz viam iespju izgltotai sabiedrbai saprotam veid dart zinmu savu vai romna varoa piederbu noteiktai kopienai, k ar apliecint s "grieu mlas" esttiskos un audzinoos aspektus. Skatjums uz Platona tekstu ir transformjies, raugoties caur laikmeta prizmu, un autora pieeja Platona tekstam faktiski ir interpretcija par o tekstu, var pat teikt -manipulcija ar o tekstu, atetinot tiei to pavedienu, kur noder paa autora interesm. Piemrus dam Platona vrda un dialogu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.336 | 0.252 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".