MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011576831 · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0477-4

Publisher Correction: MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing

2020· article· en· W3011576831 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Lieven, Moritz E. Beber, Brett G. Olivier, Frank Bergmann, Meriç Ataman, Parizad Babaei, Jennifer Bartell, Lars M. Blank, Siddharth Chauhan, Kevin Correia, Christian Diener, Andreas Dräger, Birgitta E. Ebert, Janaka N. Edirisinghe, José P. Faria, Adam M. Feist, Georgios Fengos, Ronan M. T. Fleming, Beatriz García-Jiménez, Vassily Hatzimanikatis, Wout van Helvoirt, Christopher S. Henry, Henning Hermjakob, Markus J. Herrgård, Ali Kaafarani, Hyun Uk Kim, Zachary A. King, Steffen Klamt, Edda Klipp, Jasper J. Koehorst, Matthias König, Meiyappan Lakshmanan, Dong‐Yup Lee, Sang Yup Lee, Sunjae Lee, Nathan E. Lewis, Filipe Liu, Hongwu Ma, Daniel Machado, Radhakrishnan Mahadevan, Paulo Maia, Adil Mardinoğlu, Gregory L. Medlock, Jonathan M. Monk, Jens Nielsen, Lars K. Nielsen, Juan Nogales, Intawat Nookaew, Bernhard Ø. Palsson, Jason A. Papin, Kiran Raosaheb Patil, Mark G. Poolman, Nathan D. Price, Osbaldo Reséndis-Antonio, Anne Richelle, Isabel Rocha, Benjamín J. Sánchez, Peter J. Schaap, Rahuman S. Malik‐Sheriff, Saeed Shoaie, Nikolaus Sonnenschein, Bas Teusink, Paulo Vilaça, Jon Olav Vik, Judith A. H. Wodke, Joana C. Xavier, Qianqian Yuan, Maksim Zakhartsev, Cheng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNovo Nordisk Fonden
KeywordsComputational biologyScale (ratio)Computer scienceBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFrench-language works237,207