MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The utility of DR-70, a novel blood biomarker, in the early detection of lung cancer.

2012· article· en· W3011665030 on OpenAlexaff
Afsaneh Motamed-Khorasani, Hooman Etemadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsEcoMetrix
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerInternal medicineAdenocarcinomaCancerBiomarkerOncologyLungGastroenterologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17521 Background: Lung cancer accounts for the largest percentage of cancer in adults in North America. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85-90% of all lung cancers with a death rate of 85%. Early diagnosis is the only chance of a cure when surgery or chemo-radiotherapy can be performed. Chest X-ray is the routine first diagnostic step but is not confirmatory. The purpose of this study was to further validate DR-70 utility in lung cancer early detection considering the relatively high sensitivity of this test. Onko-Sure is a regulatory approved blood test for detection/monitoring of lung cancer treatment/recurrence. It measures the accumulation of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products in the serum using anti-DR-70 antibody. Methods: A total of 239 serum samples were retrospectively obtained from a serum bank and were tested with DR-70. There were two arms: healthy controls (n= 120) and biopsy-confirmed lung cancers (n= 119) including: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n=7) and NSCLC (n=112). The NSCLC included adenocarcinoma (n=65), squamous carcinoma (n=37), large cell lung cancer (n=4) and others (n=6). The data were analyzed to find the optimal cut point, sensitivity and specificity of DR-70. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 87.5% were achieved, respectively (cut-point of 1.2 ug/ml). For SCLC, the sensitivity and specificity of 57.1% and 82.5% were achieved (cut-point: 1.1 ug/ml). For NSCLC, the sensitivity and specificity of 65.2% and 87.5% were achieved (cut-point: 1.2 ug/ml). Among the subcategories of NSCLC, DR-70 showed the highest sensitivity for acinar cell carcinoma (81.8%). Furthermore, DR-70 showed sensitivity of 59.5%, 70.4, 66.7 and 70% for stages I, II, III, and IV. Conclusions: Chest X-Ray is the routine first step in lung cancer detection with the sensitivity of 78.3%. It is not confirmatory and it can miss lesions smaller than 1 cm. These findings are promising and highlight DR-70 test as an additional first line diagnostic tool that can potentially replace X-ray to increase the diagnosis sensitivity as early as stage I. An enhanced ability to diagnose NSCLC in an early stage (I/II) should significantly improve prognosis, treatment options and survival rate for patients with lung cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→