MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011929242 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egaa014

Origin and Evolution of Magmas in the Porphyry Au-mineralized Javorie Volcano (Central Slovakia): Evidence from Thermobarometry, Melt Inclusions and Sulfide Inclusions

2019· article· en· W3011929242 on OpenAlexaff
Bertrand Rottier, Andreas Audétat, Peter Koděra, Jaroslav Lexa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsGeochemistryGeologyMelt inclusionsMagma chamberVolcanoAndesitesMagmaBasaltPetrographyAndesiteVolcanic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effect of magmatic sulfide precipitation on the potential of magmatic systems to produce porphyry-type ore deposits is still a matter of debate. In particular, we need to know whether magmatic sulfide precipitation has an impact on the Cu and Au content of the exsolving magmatic volatile phases and, by this way, on the Cu/Au ratio of porphyry deposits. The Javorie volcano is a perfect place to explore these questions. First, it hosts several Au-only porphyry-type mineralized occurrences which have among the lowest Cu/Au ratios reported in the literature. Secondly, the geology of the Javorie volcano and the timing of porphyry Au mineralization are well established. The evolution of the Javorie magmatic system was reconstructed by detailed petrographic studies and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis of minerals, melt inclusions and sulfide inclusions. The Javorie volcano was formed during the post-subduction magmatic activity affecting the Western Carpathians. It is a typical stratovolcano, composed dominantly of basaltic andesites and andesites which were intruded by several small stocks of dacitic to dioritic composition. According to our thermobarometric data, the volcano was fed by a transcrustal magmatic system in which two levels of magma chambers could be identified. Part of the magma evolved in the lower crust as suggested by the occurrence of magmatic garnet antecrysts in some of the studied rocks. The occurrence of magmatic sulfide inclusions in garnet indicates that sulfide saturation was reached in this lower crustal magma chamber. Most of the rocks crystallized in an upper crustal magma chamber (∼2 ± 1 kbar) that was fed by a basaltic to basaltic andesite magmas. A large variation in temperatures, ranging between 820°C and 1025°C, recorded by the extrusive and intrusive rocks suggest either that the upper crustal magma chamber was thermally zoned, or that the temperature of the whole magma chamber varied dramatically during its lifetime. Magmatic sulfide inclusions are present in all minerals and rocks of the upper crustal magma chamber, independent of their timing relative to porphyry Au mineralization (pre-, syn-, post-ore). These observations suggest that the magmatic system was sulfide saturated during its entire evolution. With very few exceptions, the precipitating sulfides were composed of monosulfide solid solution containing 0·2–9·2 wt % Cu and 0·05–11 ppm Au. The presence of these magmatic sulfides, together with results of a numerical model, suggest that the primitive magma feeding the upper crustal magma chamber contained less than 2·75 wt % H2O and that only a minor part of the magmatic sulfides was fractionated out of the system. Finally, the Cu/Au ratios measured in the magmatic sulfide inclusions and the ones predicted for the exsolved aqueous fluids are 10 to 100 times higher than the Cu/Au ratios of the porphyry deposits. Therefore, the extremely low Cu/Au ratios of the porphyry deposits must have been acquired during the hydrothermal stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207