MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011958099 · doi:10.1002/fam.2822

Performance of type X gypsum board on timber to non‐standard fire exposure

2020· article· en· W3011958099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFire and Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGypsumEnvironmental scienceFire protectionForensic engineeringEngineeringWaste managementCivil engineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Timber buildings are becoming increasingly sought after for their aesthetic and environmental appeal. Commonly, timber elements are encapsulated using multi‐layered fire rated gypsum board in order to prevent the timber from contributing additional fuel load to the fire or to be approved by authorities. In recent studies performed in the last 5 years where non‐standard fire exposures have been utilised, there have been concerns as to whether encapsulation successfully can improve the fire performance of the assembly due to board fall off or heat penetration between layers in the full duration of a non‐standard fire scenario (which includes cooling phases and burn out). There has been a dearth of attention in understanding the underlying mechanisms to these documented behaviours. To address this research gap, a two‐stage research program studying multi‐layered and fire‐rated gypsum clad stand‐alone columns was undertaken by the authors in both a field and controlled laboratory study. These experiments were conducted with the purpose of understanding timber column multi‐layered encapsulation performance in non‐standard fires that include a natural cooling phase. In the field study, a stand‐alone timber column within a large, open farm structure was encapsulated in three layers fire rated gypsum board. The fire was spot‐ignited and allowed to burn until the building and the column collapsed. That experiment provided evidence that the fire rated gypsum board was not sufficient to protect this timber column, as the temperature increases under the layers of gypsum board were equivalent to the temperature increases on the exterior of the column. The second stage of the research involved four, encapsulated timber columns with localised non‐standard fires (methanol pool fires exposing one face only) in controlled laboratory conditions. These tests used novel narrow‐band spectrum illumination to document the underlying breakdown of the gypsum board with non‐standard fire exposure and cooling phases. Results of these experiments imply that timber elements can be adequately protected from fire exposure providing that the screw spacing is strictly adhered to and redundant layers are utilised. The article concludes with a listing of priority research areas that will advance knowledge of the performance of gypsum boards on timber in fire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it