MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The human K-complex: Insights from combined scalp-intracranial EEG recordings

2020· article· en· W3011968277 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Véronique Latreille, Nicolás von Ellenrieder, Laure Peter‐Derex, François Dubeau, Jean Gotman, Birgit Frauscher

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
KeywordsScalpElectroencephalographyNeuroscienceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)MedicinePsychologyArtificial intelligenceAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep spindles and K-complexes (KCs) are a hallmark of N2 sleep. While the functional significance of spindles is comparatively well investigated, there is still ongoing debate about the role of the KC: it is unclear whether it is a cortical response to an arousing stimulus (either external or internal) or whether it has sleep-promoting properties. Invasive intracranial EEG recordings from individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy offer a unique opportunity to study in-situ human brain physiology. To better understand the function of the KC, we aimed to (i) investigate the intracranial correlates of spontaneous scalp KCs, and (ii) compare the intracranial activity of scalp KCs associated or not with arousals. Whole-night recordings from adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent combined intracranial-scalp EEG for pre-surgical evaluation at the Montreal Neurological Institute between 2010 and 2018 were selected. KCs were visually marked in the scalp and categorized according to the presence of microarousals: (i) Pre-microarousal KCs; (ii) KCs during an ongoing microarousal; and (iii) KCs without microarousal. Power in different spectral bands was computed to compare physiological intracranial EEG activity at the time of scalp KCs relative to the background, as well as to compare microarousal subcategories. A total of 1198 scalp KCs selected from 40 subjects were analyzed, resulting in 32,504 intracranial KC segments across 992 channels. Forty-seven percent of KCs were without microarousal, 30% were pre-microarousal, and 23% occurred during microarousals. All scalp KCs were accompanied by widespread cortical increases in delta band power (0.3-4 ​Hz) relative to the background: the highest percentages were observed in the parietal (60-65%) and frontal cortices (52-58%). Compared to KCs without microarousal, pre-microarousal KCs were accompanied by increases (66%) in beta band power (16-30 ​Hz) in the motor cortex, which was present before the peak of the KC. In addition, spatial distribution of spectral power changes following each KC without microarousal revealed that certain brain regions were associated with increases in delta power (25-62%) or decreases in alpha/beta power (11-24%), suggesting a sleep-promoting pattern, whereas others were accompanied by increases of higher frequencies (12-27%), suggesting an arousal-related pattern. This study shows that KCs can be generated across widespread cortical areas. Interestingly, the motor cortex shows awake-like EEG activity before the onset of KCs followed by microarousals. Our findings also highlight region-specific sleep- or arousal-promoting responses following KCs, suggesting a dual role for the human KC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207