Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada comme ailleurs, la commodification de la culture en événements festivaliers (Bennett et al.) va bon train. En effet, les festivals de musique, de cinéma et de culture s’y multiplient comme des champignons; certains festivals, comme le Fungus Among Us de Whistler, en Colombie-Britannique, se consacrent même à ce modeste organisme. Du Sound Symposium de Saint-Jean (Terre-Neuve) au festival Fringe de Victoria, en passant par le festival Island Unplugged de l’île Pelée (le point le plus au sud du Canada) et le festival des arts Alianait d’Iqaluit, au Nunavut, les festivals parsèment le paysage théâtral de ce territoire que l’on appelle aujourd’hui le Canada. Partout au pays, ils font de petites localités rurales des destinations touristiques et transforment des centres urbains en « villes festivalières » (voir Johannson, Thomasson). En travaillant au Cambridge Companion to International Theatre Festivals, j’ai compilé une liste de plus de quarante festivals internationaux de théâtre, de performance et d’arts multidisciplinaires au Canada, à laquelle il faudrait ajouter les festivals de musique ou de son, de cirque et d’arts visuels. S’y ajoutent encore divers rassemblements shakespeariens : le festival Shakespeare by the Sea sur la côte Est, Bard on the Beach en Colombie-Britannique, la programmation des théâtres de répertoire à Stratford et à Niagaraon-the-Lake, ou encore les nombreux festivals sans composante internationale comme le festival sans lieu fixe qu’est le Magnetic North. Il ne faudrait pas oublier non plus les vingtet-un membres de l’association canadienne de festivals Fringe (auxquels s’ajoutent neuf membres basés aux États-Unis), ni les autres festivals « rebelles » de cet ordre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.136 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".