MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012018425 · doi:10.1117/12.2550318

Performance of amorphous selenium based unipolar charge sensing detector for photon-counting X-ray imaging

2020· article· en· W3012018425 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmet Çamlıca, Denny Lee, Hyunsuk Jang, Salman M. Arnab, M. Z. Kabir, Karim S. Karim

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsOptina Diagnostics (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorPhoton countingX-ray detectorCharge sharingOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Particle detectorPhotonElectron mobilityPolarity (international relations)Charge (physics)OpticsPhysicsComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practical photon counting detectors that have been adopted for commercial use are typically based on crystalline or polycrystalline materials. However, these types of materials are challenging to scale to large-area medical imaging applications because of yield and cost issues associated with the crystal growth and bonding technology required to interface the sensor with the readout IC. An alternate approach is to use a large-area-compatible, mature, direct conversion X-ray-detection sensor such as amorphous selenium (a-Se). The technical challenges for photon counting with a-Se lie in overcoming (1) the slow carrier-transport material property of a-Se, which leads to count-rate limitations due to pile-up, and (2) the lower X-ray-to-charge conversion gain, which degrades SNR and can be resolved by improved design of pixel readout circuits. In this paper, we address the a-Se material limitation by leveraging a unipolar charge sensing detector design. We demonstrate that the proposed unipolar charge sensing detector provides an effective method to detect charge of the polarity type having a higher mobility-lifetime product, obviating the need for detection of the opposite polarity slow transport charge. Transient signal measurements indicate that a quasi depth independent signal rise-time is achieved with the unipolar charge sensing detector. Moreover, two orders of magnitude improvement is observed compared to the conventional a-Se detector rise-time (0.15 μs vs. 25 μs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical ImagingSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207