Antenatal Diagnosis of Marginal and Velamentous Placental Cord Insertion and Pregnancy Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between antenatal diagnosis of velamentous and marginal placental cord insertions with adverse perinatal outcomes of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight (less than the 5th percentile), caesarean birth, and perinatal mortality. METHODS: Using a diagnostic imaging database, we performed a cohort study of all consecutive singleton pregnancies (35,391), including 1,427 cases of marginal and 107 cases of velamentous cord insertion, delivered after 24 6/7 weeks of gestation between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, at a single Canadian tertiary care center. Cases with placenta previa, vasa previa, no documented cord insertion, or fetal anomalies were excluded. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, the rate of birth weight less than the 5th percentile was 5.2%, the rate of cesarean delivery was 27.1%, and the rate of perinatal mortality was 0.24%. Velamentous cord insertion was associated with SGA (relative risk [RR] 2.19, 95% CI 1.28-3.74). This persisted after controlling for smoking during pregnancy, diabetes, and hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.98, 95% CI 1.03-3.84). Velamentous cord insertion was also associated with an increased risk of caesarean birth (RR=1.38, 95% CI=1.08-1,77) and perinatal death (1.87%, RR 8.15, 95% CI 2.02-32.8), a relationship that persisted after controlling for smoking during pregnancy, diabetes, and hypertension (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.01-2.32). Marginal cord insertion was not associated with birth weight less than the 5th percentile (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00-1.51), cesarean delivery (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92-1.10), or perinatal death (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.62-3.78). CONCLUSION: Antenatal diagnosis of velamentous placental cord insertion is associated with birth weight less than the 5th percentile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".