MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012089138 · doi:10.1215/15476715-7962973

Scabs and Traitors: Taboo, Violence and Punishment in Labour Disputes in Britain, 1760–1871 by Thomas Lineham

2020· article· en· W3012089138 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Hay

Bibliographic record

VenueLabor Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTabooPunishment (psychology)CitationSociologyLawPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| March 01 2020 Scabs and Traitors: Taboo, Violence and Punishment in Labour Disputes in Britain, 1760–1871 by Thomas Lineham Scabs and Traitors: Taboo, Violence and Punishment in Labour Disputes in Britain, 1760–1871. Lineham, Thomas. New York: Routledge, 2018. xiv + 226 pp., £72.00 (cloth); £23.99 (paper) Douglas Hay Douglas Hay York University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Labor (2020) 17 (1): 150–151. https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-7962973 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter Email Permissions Search Site Citation Douglas Hay; Scabs and Traitors: Taboo, Violence and Punishment in Labour Disputes in Britain, 1760–1871 by Thomas Lineham. Labor 1 March 2020; 17 (1): 150–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-7962973 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsLabor Search Advanced Search Thomas Lineham wants both to describe and defend, or at least make skeptics understand, the role of worker violence (a protean word) in eighteenth- and nineteenth- century labor disputes. He exploits primary sources like union publications and much secondary writing, framed by sociological theory. He is writing against a long tradition of labor historiography that either wholly ignored, deplored, minimized, or attributed to the “primitive” state of collective bargaining the rough justice dealt to scabs and to traitors, who broke solemn promises to their mates and crossed picket lines. The book moves from an analysis of verbal violence, through the ritualized humiliation of “rough music,” including stang-riding, tarring, half-drowning, stripping naked in public (often by women), and parading men with their coats reversed to signify turncoats. Finally, stone-throwing, savage beatings, threats with firearms, and the destruction of strikebreakers’ houses and household... Copyright © 2020 Labor and Working-Class History Association2020 Issue Section: Book Reviews You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabor Studies in Working-Class History of the AmericasSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207