MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012116797 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.065206

Measurement of the photon beam asymmetry in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> GeV

2020· article· lv· W3012116797 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Adhikari, A. Ali, M. J. Amaryan, A. Austregesilo, Fernando Barbosa, J. Barlow, E. Barriga, R. Barsotti, T. D. Beattie, В. В. Бердников, T. Black, W. Boeglin, W. J. Briscoe, T. Britton, W. K. Brooks, B. E. Cannon, N. Cao, E. Chudakov, S. Cole, O. Cortes, V. Credé, M. M. Dalton, T. Daniels, A. Deur, S. Dobbs, A. Dolgolenko, R. Dotel, M. Dugger, R. Dzhygadlo, H. Egiyan, T. Erbora, A. Ernst, P. Eugenio, C. Fanelli, S. Fegan, A. M. Foda, J. H. Foote, J. Frye, S. Furletov, L. Gan, A. Gasparian, C. Gleason, K. Goetzen, A. Gonçalves, V. Goryachev, L. Guo, H. Hakobyan, A. Hamdi, G. M. Huber, A. Hurley, D. G. Ireland, M. M. Ito, N. S. Jarvis, R. W. L. Jones, V. Kakoyan, G. Kalicy, M. Kamel, C. Kourkoumelis, S. Kuleshov, I. Larin, David Lawrence, Daniel Lersch, H. Li, W. Li, B. Liu, K. Livingston, G. J. Lolos, Valery E. Lyubovitskij, D. Mack, H. Marukyan, V. Matveev, M. McCaughan, M. McCracken, W. McGinley, C. A. Meyer, R. Miskimen, R. E. Mitchell, F. Nerling, L. Ng, H. Ni, A. Ostrovidov, Z. Papandreou, M. Patsyuk, C. Paudel, P. Pauli, R. Pedroni, L. Pentchev, Κ. Peters, W. Phelps, E. Pooser, N. Qin, J. Reinhold, B. G. Ritchie, Lee Robison, D. Romanov, C. Romero, C. Salgado, A. M. Schertz, R. A. Schumacher, J. Schwiening, K. K. Seth, X. Y. Shen, M. R. Shepherd, E. S. Smith, D. I. Sober, A. Somov, S. Somov, Orlando Javier Soto Sandoval, J. R. Stevens, I. I. Strakovsky, K. Suresh, В. В. Тарасов, S. Taylor, A. Teymurazyan, A. Thiel, G. Vasileiadis, T. Whitlatch, N. Wickramaarachchi, M. Williams, Ting Xiao, Yunjie Yang, J. Zarling, Z. Zhang, Qin-Song Zhou, X. Zhou, B. Zihlmann

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAsymmetryEnergy (signal processing)Particle physicsBeam energyAtomic physicsBeam (structure)Quantum mechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report measurements of the photon beam asymmetry $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ for the reaction $\stackrel{P\vec}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}}^{0}$(1193) using the GlueX spectrometer in Hall D at Jefferson Lab. Data were collected by using a linearly polarized photon beam in the energy range of 8.2--8.8 GeV incident on a liquid hydrogen target. The beam asymmetry $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ was measured as a function of the Mandelstam variable $t$, and a single value of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ was extracted for events produced in the $u$ channel. These are the first exclusive measurements of the photon beam asymmetry $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ for the reaction in this energy range. For the $t$ channel, the measured beam asymmetry is close to unity over the $t$ range studied, $\ensuremath{-}t=(0.1--1.4)\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}$($\mathrm{GeV}/{c)}^{2}$, with an average value of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}=1.00\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$. This agrees with theoretical models that describe the reaction via the natural-parity exchange of the ${K}^{*}$(892) Regge trajectory. A value of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}=0.41\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}0.09$ is obtained for the $u$ channel integrated up to $\ensuremath{-}u=2.0$ ($\mathrm{GeV}/{c)}^{2}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.011
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0110.010
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2960.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207