MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012162103 · doi:10.21037/apm.2020.02.06

Symptom burden and characteristics of patients who die in the acute palliative care unit of a tertiary cancer center

2020· article· en· W3012162103 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grace S. Ahn, Hak Ro Kim, Beodeul Kang, Sung Soun Hur, Ji‐Won Kim, Se Hyun Kim, Jin Won Kim, Jeong‐Ok Lee, Keun‐Wook Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Soo‐Mee Bang, Jong Seok Lee, Yu Jung Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTertiary careCancerPalliative careLung cancerOdds ratioInternal medicineMultivariate analysisColorectal cancerMedical record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute palliative care unit (APCU) is a novel inpatient program in a tertiary cancer center that provides aggressive symptom management and assists with the transition to hospice. However, patients often die in the APCU before successfully transferring to hospice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the symptom burden and characteristics of advanced cancer patients who died in the APCU. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all advanced cancer patients admitted to the APCU between April 2015 and March 2016 at a tertiary cancer center in Korea. Basic characteristics and symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were retrieved. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare patients who died in the APCU with those who were discharged alive. RESULTS: Of the 267 patients, 87 patients (33%) died in the APCU. The median age of the patients was 66 years (range, 23-97 years). The most common primary cancer types were lung (21%), stomach (17%), and colorectal cancer (15%). Patients who died in the APCU had higher ESAS scores for drowsiness (6 vs. 5, P=0.002), dyspnea (4 vs. 2, P=0.001), anorexia (8 vs. 6, P=0.014) and insomnia (6 vs. 4, P=0.002) compared to patients who were discharged alive. The total symptom distress score (SDS) was also significantly higher (47 vs. 40, P=0.001) in patients who died in the APCU. In the multivariate analysis, patients who died in the APCU were more likely to be male [odds ratio (OR) 2.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-4.64, P=0.001] and have higher ESAS scores for drowsiness (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.08-3.99, P=0.029) and dyspnea (OR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.26-3.80, P=0.005). Patients who died in the APCU showed significantly shorter survival after APCU admission (7 vs. 31 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU were more likely to be male and have significantly higher symptom burden including drowsiness and dyspnea. These patients showed rapid clinical deterioration after APCU admission. More proactive and timely end-of-life care is needed for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207