MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012365305 · doi:10.19195/0137-1150.171.8

O dwóch podejściach do badań dialektów miejskich w Polsce i Czechach

2020· article· en· W3012365305 on OpenAlexaff
Bartosz Juszczak

Bibliographic record

VenueSlavica Wratislaviensia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and Culture
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechLexiconLinguisticsFolkloreSociologyGeographyHistoryAnthropologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two tendencies in researching urban dialects in Poland and the Czech RepublicThis article presents a study in urban dialects of Polish and Czech researchers. The author introduces the history and structural features of Polish and Czech urban dialects, shows differences between them in theoretical, structural and typological aspects. The main differences in the structure are caused by the various differentiation of both languages. The author comes to the conclusion that Czech urban dialects consist of many variants of the national language and are positioned high culturally and socially. Polish urban dialects that appeared in a community of low social status reveal differences in lexicon and phonetics. Nowadays, the urban dialects of both languages function as advertising and an element of folklore and are proof of citizens’ physical association with their cities and show their mentality and cultural characteristics. Два подхода в изучении городских диалектов в Польше и ЧехииСтатья посвящена проблематике изучения городских диалектов польскими и чешскими учеными. Рассматривается история и структурная характеристика польских и чешских городских диалектов. В работе представлены различия языка города в Польше и Чехии в теоретическом, структурном и типологическом планах. Основные несоответствия в структурах городских диалектов объяснены разницами в дифференциации национального языка как польского, так и чешского. Изученные исследования показали, что чешские городские диалекты представляют собой смесь разных вариантов национального языка, а их культурносоциальный статус является достаточно высоким. Польские городские диалекты, возникшие среди носителей с низким социальным статусом, отличаются друд от друга, в них имеются различия на лексическом и фонетическом уровях. В настоящее время городские диалекты обоих языков выполняют фольклорно-рекламную функцию и свидетельствуют о связи горожан со своим городом, их менталитете и культурных особенностях.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSlavica WratislaviensiaSame topicLanguage and CultureFrench-language works237,207