Characterizing marsh wetlands in the Great Lakes Basin with C-band InSAR observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is limited research focusing on Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) applications in the Great Lakes coastal wetlands with large water level fluctuations. In this study, we investigated the potential of using C-band SAR data to characterize marsh wetland and monitor water level changes along the coast of the Great Lakes. InSAR analysis was conducted using Radarsat-2 and Sentinel-1 data collected at Long Point, Ontario, Canada over the period of 2016–2018. Observations indicated that both backscattering coefficients and coherence from tall plants (e.g. cattail/Phragmites), short plants (e.g. grass), and water varied with different sensor modes (incidence angles and polarizations) in response to changes in phenology, disturbance, and water level. InSAR phase changes were closely related to fluctuations in water level and flow direction. We evaluated InSAR time series observations using measurements from water level loggers based on correlation and root mean square error (RMSE). It was found that correlation between InSAR measurements and water level changes in the field varied depending on the site, type of wetland vegetation, incidence angle and polarization. Although results from some sensor modes provided good correlation at a few locations, the low fringe rate and RMSE between 9 and 28 cm indicated that InSAR observations of water level changes were generally underestimated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".