MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of BRM promoter variants on survival outcomes of stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

2013· article· en· W3012536761 on OpenAlexaff
Sinéad Cuffe, Lu Cheng, Abul Kalam Azad, Yonathan Brhane, Dangxiao Cheng, Zhuo Chen, Xin Qiu, Kevin Boyd, Marjan Emami, Natasha B. Leighl, Sandy Der, Wei Xu, Frances A. Shepherd, Ming‐Sound Tsao, David Reisman, Geoffrey Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOncologyLung cancerInternal medicineProportional hazards modelHazard ratioCancer researchEpigeneticsGeneBiologyGeneticsConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

11057 Background: BRM, a key catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, is a putative tumor susceptibility gene in NSCLC. Loss of BRM expression occurs in 15% of NSCLC, and has been linked to adverse outcome. Recently, our group has shown that variants of two novel BRM promoter insertion polymorphisms (BRM-741, BRM-1321) lead to loss of BRM expression by recruiting histone deacetylases; individuals carrying homozygous variants for both polymorphisms have doubled NSCLC risk; pharmacological reversal of these epigenetic changes is a potentially viable therapeutic strategy. We thus evaluated the effect of BRM promoter variants on survival outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients, where initial clinical trials are likely to be focused. Methods: 564 stage III-IV NSCLC patients were genotyped for the BRM promoter variants using Taqman. Association of BRM variants and overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for prognostic variables. Results: Among our patients, 73% were Caucasian, 52% male, median age 63yrs, 55% stage IV disease, and 67% adenocarcinoma. Median OS was 1.6yrs; median follow up, 3.6yrs. The frequency of homozygosity was BRM-741, 23%; BRM-1321, 21%; both, 12%. Homozygous variants of BRM-741 were strongly associated with worse OS (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.3 [p=2x10E-8]) and PFS (aHR 2.0 [p=2x10E-7]) compared to the wild types. Similar findings were observed for BRM-1321 homozygous variants (aHR for OS 1.8 [p=8x10E-5] and aHR for PFS 1.6 [p=2x10E-4]). Carrying homozygous variants of both BRM-741 and BRM-1321 was associated with substantially worse OS (aHR 2.3 [p=1x10E-5]) and PFS (aHR 2.2 [p=3x10E-6]), with similar associations seen among the stage III (aHR for OS 2.3 [p=6x10E-6]) and stage IV (aHR for OS 2.5 [p=5x10E-6]) patients. Conclusions: The same two homozygous BRM promoter variants that are associated with increased risk of NSCLC are also strongly associated with adverse OS and PFS in this cohort of stage III-IV NSCLC patients. Validation of results in a clinical trial dataset is underway, and will better elucidate the prognostic significance of these BRM promoter variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207