The contributions of emotion regulation difficulties and dissociative symptoms to functional impairment among civilian inpatients with posttraumatic stress symptoms.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional impairment among individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represents a significant factor in recovery. Critically, functional impairment appears to persist following remission of PTSD symptoms. To date, work investigating functional impairment among individuals with PTSD has focused on PTSD symptom clusters, excluding other relevant symptoms, including emotion regulation difficulties and dissociative symptoms. Emerging work suggests that these symptoms may serve as important predictors of functional impairment among individuals with PTSD. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The present study investigated the contributions of difficulties with emotion regulation, dissociative symptoms, and individual PTSD symptom clusters to functional impairment among an inpatient civilian sample who completed self-report assessments of PTSD symptoms, functional impairment, emotion regulation difficulties, and dissociative symptoms, upon admission to the program. Participants met criteria for probable PTSD as per the PTSD checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) and reported high rates of exposure to childhood abuse and neglect. RESULTS: Emotion regulation difficulties contributed significantly, while dissociative symptoms and PTSD arousal and reactivity symptoms showed a signal toward contributing significantly to a model accounting for variance in functional impairment among individuals with probable PTSD. Differential patterns of contributors emerged for the various domains of functional impairment measured. CONCLUSIONS: These findings add to a growing body of literature highlighting the importance of emotion regulation difficulties, dissociative symptoms, and arousal and reactivity symptoms in contributing to functional impairment in this disorder. Recovery to premorbid functional status in PTSD may require interventions that target directly these symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".