Flexible Fitting of Small Molecules into Electron Microscopy Maps Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Neural Network Potentials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite significant advances in resolution, the potential for cryo-electron microscopy (EM) to be used in determining the structures of protein-drug complexes remains unrealized. Determination of accurate structures and coordination of bound ligands necessitates simultaneous fitting of the models into the density envelopes, exhaustive sampling of the ligand geometries, and, most importantly, concomitant rearrangements in the side chains to optimize the binding energy changes. In this article, we present a flexible-fitting pipeline where molecular dynamics flexible fitting (MDFF) is used to refine structures of protein-ligand complexes from 3 to 5 Å electron density data. Enhanced sampling is employed to explore the binding pocket rearrangements. To provide a model that can accurately describe the conformational dynamics of the chemically diverse set of small-molecule drugs inside MDFF, we use QM/MM and neural-network potential (NNP)/MM models of protein-ligand complexes, where the ligand is represented using the QM or NNP model, and the protein is represented using established molecular mechanical force fields (e.g., CHARMM). This pipeline offers structures commensurate to or better than recently submitted high-resolution cryo-EM or X-ray models, even when given medium to low-resolution data as input. The use of the NNPs makes the algorithm more robust to the choice of search models, offering a radius of convergence of 6.5 Å for ligand structure determination. The quality of the predicted structures was also judged by density functional theory calculations of ligand strain energy. This strain potential energy is found to systematically decrease with better fitting to density and improved ligand coordination, indicating correct binding interactions. A computationally inexpensive protocol for computing strain energy is reported as part of the model analysis protocol that monitors both the ligand fit as well as model quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".