Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría turns 90 years old
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Before focusing on the 90 th anniversary of Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría, I would like to briefly review its history.On January 7 th , 1867, the Charitable Society agreed to build a children's hospital in the city of Buenos Aires.After several delays, on April 9 th , 1875, Hospital de Niños "San Luis Gonzaga" was opened.It was located at Victoria 1179 (today, Hipólito Yrigoyen 3420).In August of that same year, Ricardo Gutiérrez, M.D., returned to Argentina and became the hospital's manager.One year later, due to the hospital's small capacity, a new building was inaugurated at Arenales 1462.In 1886, Ricardo Gutiérrez asked the ladies from the Charitable Society to build a new, bigger hospital.After several problems and formalities, the building foundations were laid at Gallo 984/1016 (currently Gallo 1330) in March 1883.Towards the end of 1896, the building on Gallo Street opened.Unfortunately, Ricardo Gutiérrez, who had been the actual pioneer of the children's hospital for 20 years, was not able to attend because he passed away on August 26 th , 1896.It is worth noting that the new and larger hospital wings were built under the commands of Christophersen, an architect who had won the gold medal at the Chicago exhibition.This was the first and largest children's hospital of Latin America.The first publication about pediatrics was the Revista del Hospital de Niños, launched in 1897 by Antonio Arraga, M.D., the hospital's manager.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".