MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012685738 · doi:10.5546/aap.2020.eng.2

Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría turns 90 years old

2019· editorial· es· W3012685738 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivos Argentinos de Pediatria · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsThe Journal of Student Science and Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionMedalHistoryLibrary scienceMedicinePolitical scienceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before focusing on the 90 th anniversary of Archivos Argentinos de Pediatra, I would like to briefly review its history. On January 7 th , 1867, the Charitable Society agreed to build a children's hospital in the city of Buenos Aires. After several delays, on April 9 th , 1875, Hospital de Nios "San Luis Gonzaga" was opened. It was located at Victoria 1179 (today, Hiplito Yrigoyen 3420). In August of that same year, Ricardo Gutirrez, M.D., returned to Argentina and became the hospital's manager. One year later, due to the hospital's small capacity, a new building was inaugurated at Arenales 1462. In 1886, Ricardo Gutirrez asked the ladies from the Charitable Society to build a new, bigger hospital. After several problems and formalities, the building foundations were laid at Gallo 984/1016 (currently Gallo 1330) in March 1883. Towards the end of 1896, the building on Gallo Street opened. Unfortunately, Ricardo Gutirrez, who had been the actual pioneer of the children's hospital for 20 years, was not able to attend because he passed away on August 26 th , 1896. It is worth noting that the new and larger hospital wings were built under the commands of Christophersen, an architect who had won the gold medal at the Chicago exhibition. This was the first and largest children's hospital of Latin America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivos Argentinos de PediatriaSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207