Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’entorse de la cheville est la blessure la plus frequente a la fois chez les sportifs et dans la population generale. L’equipe canadienne de Stiell a etabli des regles, les criteres d’Ottawa, permettant de maniere fiable, de selectionner les patients necessitant un bilan radiographique devant un traumatisme de la cheville. La sensibilite de ces criteres est proche de 100%. Pour autant, il a ete montre qu’ils n’etaient pas appliques en medecine generale. L’objectif principal de cette etude a ete d’essayer d’en determiner les raisons. L’etude qualitative a permis de realiser des entretiens semi-diriges, enregistres, au cabinet de medecins generalistes de Corbeil-Essonnes et de sa peripherie. Un verbatim a ete obtenu puis analyse. Les criteres d’Ottawa ne sont pas appliques pour differents motifs : par meconnaissance; devant certains contextes medico-legaux ; du fait de pressions ou d’inquietudes du patient voire parfois du medecin ; par manque de disponibilite ou d’experience de ce dernier ; selon le profil de certains patients. Ils simplifient pourtant a demarche diagnostique, conduisent a une reduction des depenses de sante et une diminution de l’irradiation des patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it