MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012830003 · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2020.03.003

Monitoring of methylglyoxal/indole interaction by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and qTOF/MS/MS analysis

2020· article· en· W3012830003 on OpenAlexafffund
Raheleh Ghassem Zadeh, Varoujan A. Yaylayan

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Research in Food Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Glycation End Products research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMethylglyoxalMaillard reactionChemistryAdductIndole testSpectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyPhotochemistryMass spectrometryInfrared spectroscopyOrganic chemistryChromatographyChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sugar derived reactive 1,2-dicarbonyl intermediates are considered important precursors for the formation of Maillard reaction products. Efficient strategies are needed to modulate their formation in food. Indole a major thermal degradation product of tryptophan, has been shown to scavenge such 1,2-dicarbonyls at high temperatures. In this study, the trapping of methylglyoxal by indole was monitored at various temperatures either by (a) ATR-FTIR spectroscopy or (b) in-solution using qTOF/MS/MS analysis. Information obtained through these studies have indicated that even at room temperature indole can quickly react with methylglyoxal forming an adduct as confirmed by the emergence of a new peak at 1729 cm−1 and by qTOF/MS/MS analysis. On the open surface of the ATR crystal this adduct underwent a fast oxidization into carboxylic acid as evidenced by the disappearance of the band at 1729 cm−1 and the formation of a new band at 1712 cm−1 and its subsequent conversion into a carboxylate band under basic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Research in Food ScienceSame topicAdvanced Glycation End Products researchFrench-language works237,207