MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

One-Bit Precoding Constellation Design via Autoencoder-Based Deep Learning

2019· article· en· W3013226971 on OpenAlexaff
Foad Sohrabi, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuadrature amplitude modulationPhase-shift keyingPrecodingQAMConstellation diagramElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmMIMOTelecommunicationsBit error rateEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers a multicasting system in which the base station has a large number of antennas with cost-effective one-bit digital-to-analog converters and aims to send a common symbol to multiple remote users. Unlike the existing literature which seeks to design the one-bit precoder for a given constellation, e.g., quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) or phase shift keying (PSK), this paper aims to jointly design the transmit one-bit precoder and the receive constellation by leveraging the concept of autoencoder, wherein the end-to-end multicasting system is modeled using a deep neural network with the one-bit precoding constraint represented by a binary thresholding layer. To deal with the issue that such a binary layer always produces a gradient of zero, and thus prevents an effective end-to-end training when using the conventional back-propagation method, this paper uses a variant of straight-through estimator which approximates the thresholding function with a properly scaled sigmoid function in the back-propagation phase. Numerical results show that, for a fixed channel scenario, the proposed autoencoder-based constellation design is superior to the conventional QAM and PSK constellations. Using the insights obtained from fixed channel scenarios, we also propose a constellation design for varying channel scenarios and numerically show that the proposed design achieves a better performance as compared to the conventional constellations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207