MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B88: GPNMB expression modulates the tumor immune microenvironment in mouse models of breast cancer

2020· article· en· W3013332782 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew G. Annis, April A. N. Rose, Ryuhjin Ahn, Brian E. Hsu, Josie Ursini‐Siegel, Peter M. Siegel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemTumor microenvironmentGranzyme BCancer researchCD8BiologyCytotoxic T cellImmunologyImmunotherapyAcquired immune systemBreast cancerT cellCancerIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The role of glycoprotein-NMB (GPNMB) in the immune system is varied. GPNMB expression in macrophages and dendritic cells promotes innate immune responses, whereas GPNMB-expressing myeloid-derived suppressor (MDSC) cells suppress adaptive immune responses (T-cell function). While functional roles for GPNMB expressed within cells of the immune system are emerging, the influence of tumor-derived GPNMB expression on the immune landscape within mammary tumors has not been well characterized. To investigate this further, we have generated two GPNMB-deficient breast cancer cell populations (Lung Metastatic-4T1 [LM-4T1] and E0771 cells) to determine the influence of GPNMB on the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). While loss of GPNMB significantly impaired tumor growth of both these breast cancer models in syngeneic mice, this difference was not apparent with LM-4T1 injected in athymic nude mice. These observations suggest GPNMB may promote tumor growth by modulating the T-cell function. We have used traditional immunohistochemical analyses to broadly characterize the T cells present in the TME of E0771 and LM-4T1 breast tumors, which express or lack GPNMB. We have observed a significant increase in both CD8+ and CD4+ immune cells in GPNMB-deficient LM-4T1 and E0771 tumors compared to parental cells at an experimental endpoint of matched tumor volumes. To determine the temporal response of the immune system to LM-4T1 cells, we have isolated early developing lesions and stained for CD8, CD4, Fox3p, and granzyme B positive cells. We observed a significant increase in CD4+ and a trend for elevated granzyme B+ cells at early timepoints in GPNMB-deficient tumors compared to LM-4T1 parental cells. Taken together, these results suggest GPNMB suppresses an early recruitment of CD4+ cells where, in the absence of GPNMB, this would result in elevated CD8+ and CD4+ cells in these tumors. We are currently characterizing the contribution of CD4+ cells in the progression of these tumor models. Citation Format: Matthew G. Annis, April A.N. Rose, Ryuhjin Ahn, Brian E. Hsu, Josie Ursini-Siegel, Peter M. Siegel. GPNMB expression modulates the tumor immune microenvironment in mouse models of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2019 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B88.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207