MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013413864 · doi:10.1161/jaha.119.014541

Comparative Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population‐Based Analysis

2020· article· en· W3013413864 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Charlotte Zerna, Edwin Rogers, Doreen M. Rabi, Andrew M. Demchuk, Noreen Kamal, Balraj Mann, Tom Jeerakathil, Brian Buck, Ashfaq Shuaib, Jeremy Rempel, Bijoy K. Menon, Mayank Goyal, Michael D. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie UniversityAlberta Health ServicesOntario Brain InstituteSouth Health CampusAlberta HealthUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeStroke (engine)PopulationEndovascular treatmentEmergency medicineClinical trialPediatricsInternal medicinePhysical therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background A heterogeneous patient population receives endovascular treatment ( EVT ) for acute ischemic stroke caused by proximal large‐vessel occlusion every day. We aimed to conduct a population‐based study of EVT in the province of Alberta, Canada, to understand the effectiveness in a complete population and how the magnitude of effect differs from the artificial world of clinical trials. Methods and Results Within a 3‐year period (April 2015 to March 2018), 576 patients fit the inclusion criteria of our study and constituted the EVT group of our analysis. The medical treatment group of the ESCAPE (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT [Computed Tomography] to Recanalization Times) trial had 150 patients. Thus, our total sample size was 726. We captured outcomes in clinical routine using administrative data and a linked database method. Primary outcome of our study was home‐time. Home‐time refers to the number of days that the patient was back at premorbid living situation without increase in level of care within 90 days of index stroke event. Median age of patients was 70 years (interquartile range, 59–81 years), and 47.8% were women. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range, 13–20). EVT was associated with an increased 90‐day home‐time by an average of 8.5 days compared with medical treatment alone using Cragg hurdle regression ( P =0.009). Age and higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score were associated with decreased 90‐day home‐time (both P <0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed no association between EVT and mortality at 90 days (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.47–1.24). Conclusions EVT for acute ischemic stroke caused by proximal large‐vessel occlusion was effective in our province‐wide population‐based study and results in an increase of 90‐day home‐time by ~8.5 days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart AssociationSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207