MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B62: Development of novel chimeric antigen receptor T cells for immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

2020· article· en· W3013453726 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaotao Jiang, Leidy D. Caraballo G., Huajun Zhang, Xiangyang Chi, Yibing Peng, Aiwu Ruth He, Yanxia Shao, Lun Cai, Yukai He

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeMonoclonal antibodyAntigenImmunotherapyEffectorCancer immunotherapyImmunohistochemistryCancer researchHepatocellular carcinomaAntibodyAdoptive cell transferMolecular biologyT cellBiologyImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aim: Several glypican 3 (hGPC3)-specific chimeric-antigen-receptor modified T cells (CARTs) are in trials for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but most are constructed from one monoclonal antibody (mAb). It is unknown how targeting different hGPC3 epitopes will affect CART’s efficacy. The aim of this study is to develop novel effective CARTs by targeting different regions of hGPC3. Methods: BalB/C mice were immunized with hGPC3 protein to generate novel mAbs that targeted different regions of hGPC3. CARTs were then built from mAbs and their antitumor effect was studied. Results: Twenty-two mAbs were identified by ELISA. Fourteen of them bound HepG2 cells. Five mAbs were further characterized by immunohistochemical staining. Three of them (6G11, 8F8, and 12D7) were found to specifically stain HCC tumors but not adjacent normal tissues. The mAbs’ affinity was in the nanomolar range. 6G11 and 8F8 bound to hGPC3 N-(AA25-39) and C-(AA463-496) epitopes, respectively. 12D7 recognized a conformational epitope in the hGPC3 N-fragment (AA25-358). All CARTs built from the mAbs underwent expansion after GPC3+ cell stimulation. However, their effector function was significantly different. 8F8 CARTs possessed the strongest effector function. 6G11 CARTs experienced the greatest expansion, but with slightly weaker function. In contrast, 12D7 CARTs showed minimal effector function. Soluble hGPC3 did not activate CARTs or block CART activation by tumor cells. Adoptive transfer of 8F8 and 6G11, but not 12D7, CARTs generated complete regression of HCC xenografts in NSG mice. Conclusion: The three novel CARTs that target a membrane-distal N-epitope, a membrane-proximal C-epitope, or a conformational epitope of hGPC3 possessed different effector function and antitumor effects. CARTs targeting the hGPC3 N- or C specific epitope generated potent antitumor effects, while CARTs targeting an hGPC3-N conformational epitope showed minimal effector function. Citation Format: Xiaotao Jiang, Leidy D. Caraballo G., Huajun Zhang, Xiangyang Chi, Yibing Peng, Aiwu R. He, Yanxia Shao, Lun Cai, Yukai He. Development of novel chimeric antigen receptor T cells for immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2019 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B62.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207