MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3013492464

Sub-megabase resolution array CGH profiling of small cell lung cancer cell lines.

2004· article· en· W3013492464 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bradley P. Coe, Eric Lee, Adi F. Gazdar, John D. Minna, Stephen Lam, Calum MacAulay, Wan L. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparative genomic hybridizationBiologyCopy number analysisGenomeHuman genomeCarcinogenesisLung cancerGeneticsComputational biologyCancerCancer researchCopy-number variationGenePathologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3430 Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% of the yearly cases of lung cancer in the United States. Survival rates for this disease have improved little over the last 20 years with median survival times of only 7-13 months. This may in part be due to the high frequency of relapse with resistant micrometastatic disease after initial chemotherapy. The identification of molecular targets for prognosis and therapy of the disease may be crucial in improving survival rates of SCLC. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a new method for detecting genomic alterations in human cancers, which may allow the rapid discovery of novel genes involved in tumorigenesis. We have designed a CGH array which represents a >100-fold increase in resolution over conventional metaphase CGH allowing for genome-wide identification of genetic alterations at a resolution of 100kbp. Objectives: To identify novel genetic alterations in SCLC cell lines by high resolution copy number profiling of the entire human genome. Design: Utilizing a human whole-genome 32,433 overlapping BAC clone set we have created a CGH array spanning the entire genome at an average density of 10 clones per megabase. This array was then used to profile 15 SCLC cell lines for copy number changes. Sample DNA was labeled with cyanine 5 through a random priming reaction and co-hybridized with a cyanine 3 labeled reference DNA to the arrays. Post-hybridization the arrays were scanned using a CCD based imaging system from Applied Precision. Signal ratios were then determined using the Softworx array analysis program. Results: We have delineated breakpoints in SCLC lines to within one BAC clone in single experiments. This high resolution profiling has allowed us to identify both the expected alterations at loci such as hTERT, ATM and MYC as well as novel micro-amplifications and deletions as small as 200kb that have not been detected by conventional methodologies. This has allowed us to rapidly identify novel candidate genes associated with SCLC tumorigenesis. Conclusions High resolution genome wide array CGH has allowed the rapid identification of novel candidate genes associated with lung cancer tumorigenesis. This work was supported by grants from Genome Canada/B.C., NCIC Terry Fox New Frontiers, and Lung SPORE P50 CA70907.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→