MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013493293 · doi:10.1017/9781787446618.018

Experiential Pedagogy to Join the Thread of Conversation with Paul et Virginie

2020· other· en· W3013493293 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Servanne Woodward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOutdoor and Experiential Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationThread (computing)Join (topology)Experiential learningSociologyComputer scienceArtCommunicationPedagogyMathematicsOperating systemCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is a challenge to bring an eighteenth-century French novel into the “learn- ing community” of a third-year university classroom for a French studies curriculum in the Anglophone province of Ontario. In her 2014 disserta- tion on experiential learning, Jennifer Niester-Mika noted the difficulty of bringing together students who come “from an array of backgrounds.” In the multicultural classroom of Canada, we cannot count on shared popular culture, and we are, in effect, in “a world in which every utterance has an infinite plurality of meaning” for a variety of reasons—including a limited control of (French) language, which sometimes results in misunderstand- ings and occasional reluctance to engage in class conversation. This chapter shares how I used experiential pedagogy successfully to teach Jacques-Henri Bernardin de Saint-Pierre's 1788 novel Paul et Virginie to achieve my goal to have the class join the conversation, while fostering student investment in cultural items, such as the library display of eighteenth- and nineteenth- century paper books. North American libraries generously grant free access to very old books, which allows students to experience their weight, tex- ture, print, paper quality, and luxurious bindings. However, the fact that they were locked away in a glass case for the library exhibit seemed to give them a daunting aura, so I sent students on a quest to locate other cultural objects relevant to the novel. For instance, students located hopscotches and labyrinths in their own town (we found one labyrinth on campus; it was a modern expression of an old practice). We also considered the way in which gardening in the novel compares with students’ own relationship to seeds and plants, so that they understood the novel as reflecting familiar daily activities. One enduring cultural activity is the consumption of romance novels that have tragic endings. The novel central to this experiment, the lowbrow and popular Paul et Virginie , bears some resemblance to the 1997 blockbuster Titanic because of the common tropes of forbidden love and heroic deeds, and the grand finale of a sinking ship in catastrophic weather conditions. These multiple points of access to the novel invite a pedagogical strategy that makes use of experiential learning and adaptation to strengthen critical thinking and cultural awareness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.019
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOutdoor and Experiential EducationFrench-language works237,207